Source-Checked Stock Research
Use ThesisCheck for stock research where every material claim is tied to dated evidence and missing proof is shown plainly.
I want stock research with citations I can inspect instead of confident AI summaries that do not show where the claims came from.
Source-checked stock research ties material claims to dated evidence, separates exact quotes from summaries, and marks unsupported proof gaps. ThesisCheck applies that structure to a user-provided stock thesis.
What source-checked stock research means
Source-checked stock research is research where the important claims can be traced back to dated public evidence. The useful unit is not just the paragraph; it is the claim, source, date, locator, and evidence status.
- Exact source language is labeled as a quote.
- ThesisCheck-authored interpretation is labeled as a summary.
- Insufficient evidence is labeled as a gap, not promoted into certainty.
Primary sources, secondary sources, and unsupported claims
The point is not to add citations for decoration. The point is to show whether a claim can be checked from public evidence.
Filings, annual reports, and investor materials matter because they are tied to the company record.
A summary can be useful, but it should not be disguised as source language.
When the public record shown does not prove a claim, the page should say so plainly.
Example source-ledger snippet
Microsoft's AI infrastructure spending is justified by cloud revenue growth.
The public demo can verify cloud growth from the annual report, but not a standalone AI infrastructure ROI calculation.
Evidence summary: The annual report supports Azure and other cloud services growth, while the abridged public evidence shown here does not isolate product-level ROI for AI infrastructure investments.
A source-led review should show both sides of the evidence boundary: what the source supports, what the summary infers, and what remains unsupported.
Generic AI summary vs source-checked thesis review
May provide a fluent answer without showing where each claim came from.
Shows source label, date, locator, and whether the evidence is quote, summary, or gap.
Answers a broad prompt about a company or market.
Tests a specific thesis against public company evidence.
Can sound certain while blending support, context, and speculation.
Separates support, contradiction, and missing evidence.